Browsing by Author "T.K. Jha"

Now showing 1 - 8 of 8

Injectable paromomycin for visceral leishmaniasis in India
(Massachussetts Medical Society, 2007) Shyam Sundar; T.K. Jha; Chandreshwar P. Thakur; Prabhat K. Sinha; Sujit K. Bhattacharya
Background: Visceral leishmaniasis (kala-azar) affects large, rural, resource-poor populations in South Asia, Africa, and Brazil. Safe, effective, and affordable new therapies are needed. We conducted a randomized, controlled, phase 3 open-label study comparing paromomycin, an aminoglycoside, with amphotericin B, the present standard of care in Bihar, India. Methods: In four treatment centers for visceral leishmaniasis, 667 patients between 5 and 55 years of age who were negative for the human immunodeficiency virus and had parasitologically confirmed visceral leishmaniasis were randomly assigned in a 3:1 ratio to receive paromomycin (502 patients) at a dose of 11 mg per kilogram of body weight intramuscularly daily for 21 days or amphotericin B (165 patients) at a dose of 1 mg per kilogram intravenously every other day for 30 days. Final cure was assessed 6 months after the end of treatment; safety assessments included daily clinical evaluations and weekly laboratory and audiometric evaluations. Noninferiority testing was used to compare 6-month cure rates, with a chosen margin of noninferiority of 10 percentage points. Results: Paromomycin was shown to be noninferior to amphotericin B (final cure rate, 94.6% vs. 98.8%; difference, 4.2 percentage points; upper bound of the 97.5% confidence interval, 6.9; P<0.001). Mortality rates in the two groups were less than 1%. Adverse events, which were more common among patients receiving paromomycin than among those receiving amphotericin B (6% vs. 2%, P = 0.02), included transient elevation of aspartate aminotransferase levels (>3 times the upper limit of the normal range); transient reversible ototoxicity (2% vs. 0, P = 0.20); and injection-site pain (55% vs. 0, P<0.001); and in patients receiving amphotericin B, as compared with those receiving paromomycin, nephrotoxicity (4% vs. 0, P<0.001), fevers (57% vs. 3%), rigors (24% vs. 0, P<0.001), and vomiting (10% vs. <1%, P<0.001). Conclusions: Paromomycin was shown to be noninferior to amphotericin B for the treatment of visceral leishmaniasis in India. (ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT00216346.) Copyright © 2007 Massachusetts Medical Society.
Miltefosine, an oral agent, for the treatment of indian visceral leishmaniasis
(1999) T.K. Jha; Shyam Sundar; C.P. Thakur; Peter Bachmann; Juntra Karbwang; Christina Fischer; Andreas Voss; Jonathan Berman
Background: There is no effective orally administered medication for any leishmania infection. We investigated miltefosine, which can be taken orally, for the treatment of Indian visceral leishmaniasis. Miltefosine is a phosphocholine analogue that affects cell-signaling pathways and membrane synthesis. Methods: The study was an open-label, multicenter, phase 2 trial in which four 30-person cohorts received 50, 100, or 150 mg of miltefosine per day for four or six weeks. The 120 patients, who ranged in age from 12 to 50 years, had anorexia, fever, and splenomegaly with at least moderate (2+) leishmania in a splenic aspirate. A parasitologic cure was defined by the absence of parasites in a splenic aspirate obtained two weeks after completion of treatment. The clinical response was assessed at six months. Results: In all 120 patients there was an initial parasitologic cure. Six patients had clinical and parasitologic relapses; the remaining 114 patients had not relapsed by six months after treatment, for a cure rate of 95 percent (95 percent confidence interval, 89 to 98 percent). With the regimen of 100 mg of miltefosine per day (approximately 2.5 mg per kilogram of body weight per day) for four weeks, 29 of 30 patients (97 percent) were cured. Gastrointestinal side effects were frequent (occurring in 62 percent of patients) but mild to moderate in severity, and no patient discontinued therapy because of gastrointestinal side effects. In two patients, treatment was discontinued because of elevated levels of aspartate aminotransferase or creatinine; in both patients the levels rapidly returned to normal. In 12 other patients, the level of aspartate aminotransferase increased to 100 to 150 U per liter during treatment. Conclusions: Orally administered miltefosine appears to be an effective treatment for Indian visceral leishmaniasis.
Oral miltefosine for Indian post-kala-azar dermal leishmaniasis: A randomised trial
(2013) Shyam Sundar; Prabat Sinha; T.K. Jha; Jaya Chakravarty; Madhukar Rai; Nawin Kumar; Krishna Pandey; M.K. Narain; N. Verma; V.N.R. Das; P. Das; Jonathan Berman; Byron Arana
Objective: Standard treatment of Indian post-kala-azar dermal leishmaniasis (PKDL) is unsatisfactory because to achieve therapeutic effectiveness, heroic courses of parenteral and toxic agents have to be administered. Our objective was to evaluate oral miltefosine for its potential to provide effective as well as tolerable treatment for this disease. Method: Open-label, randomised, parallel-group multicentric trial. Miltefosine, 100 mg/day to all but one patient, was administered for 12 weeks or 8 weeks, with a target of 18 patients in each treatment group. Key endpoints were tolerance during treatment and efficacy at 12 months of follow-up. Results: The ITT and per-protocol cure rates after 12 months of follow-up for patients receiving 12 weeks of therapy were 78% (14 of 18 patients: 95% CI = 61-88%) and 93% (14 of 15 patients: 95% CI = 71-95%), respectively, after 12 months of follow-up. The ITT and per-protocol cure rates for patients receiving 8 weeks of therapy were 76% (13 of 17 patients: 95% CI = 53-90%) and 81% (13 of 16 patients: 95% CI = 57-93%), respectively. Gastrointestinal and other adverse events were rare. Conclusions: This study suggests that oral miltefosine for 2-3 months can be considered a treatment of choice for Indian PKDL. © 2012 Blackwell Publishing Ltd.
Oral miltefosine for Indian visceral leishmaniasis
(2002) Shyam Sundar; T.K. Jha; C.P. Thakur; Juergen Engel; Herbert Sindermann; Christina Fischer; Klaus Junge; Anthony Bryceson; Jonathan Berman
Background: There are 500,000 cases per year of visceral leishmaniasis, which occurs primarily in the Indian subcontinent. Almost all untreated patients die, and all the effective agents have been parenteral. Miltefosine is an oral agent that has been shown in small numbers of patients to have a favorable therapeutic index for Indian visceral leishmaniasis. We performed a clinical trial in India comparing miltefosine with the most effective standard treatment, amphotericin B. Methods: The study was a randomized, open-label comparison, in which 299 patients 12 years of age or older received orally administered miltefosine (50 or 100 mg [approximately 2.5 mg per kilogram of body weight] daily for 28 days) and 99 patients received intravenously administered amphotericin B (1 mg per kilogram every other day for a total of 15 injections). Results: The groups were well matched in terms of age, weight, proportion with previous failure of treatment for leishmaniasis, parasitologic grade of splenic aspirate, and splenomegaly. At the end of treatment, splenic aspirates were obtained from 293 patients in the miltefosine group and 98 patients in the amphotericin B group. No parasites were identified, for an initial cure rate of 100 percent. By six months after the completion of treatment, 282 of the 299 patients in the miltefosine group (94 percent [95 percent confidence interval, 91 to 97]) and 96 of the 99 patients in the amphotericin B group (97 percent) had not had a relapse; these patients were classified as cured. Vomiting and diarrhea, generally lasting one to two days, occurred in 38 percent and 20 percent of the patients in the miltefosine group, respectively. Conclusions: Oral miltefosine is an effective and safe treatment for Indian visceral leishmaniasis. Miltefosine may be particularly advantageous because it can be administered orally. It may also be helpful in regions where parasites are resistant to current agents. Copyright © 2002 Massachusetts Medical Society.
Oral miltefosine for the treatment of Indian visceral leishmaniasis
(2006) Shyam Sundar; T.K. Jha; C.P. Thakur; S.K. Bhattacharya; M. Rai
Large-scale antimony resistance in the treatment of visceral leishmaniasis (VL) in north Bihar, India, has led to the development of miltefosine as an alternative therapy. In a pilot study and later in three Phase II studies involving 249 patients, oral miltefosine, 100-150 mg/day for 28 days, was shown to cure ∼90% patients with reasonable safety. In the pivotal Phase III trial, 299 patients were treated at three centres with amphotericin B as the comparator drug (99 patients). In this trial 38% and 20% patients had mild to moderate vomiting and diarrhoea respectively, similar to previous studies. Asymptomatic transient elevation of hepatic transaminases and mild renal dysfunction were observed in 15% and 10% patients respectively. The final cure rate was 94% with miltefosine and 97% with amphotericin B; based on these results, the drug was approved in India. Subsequently in two paediatric studies involving 119 patients in the age group of 2-11 years, the safety and efficacy of miltefosine (2.5 mg/kg daily for 28 days) was established with a cure rate (94%) similar to that seen in adults. Miltefosine is the first oral antileishmanial drug with a high degree of safety and efficacy for the treatment of VL. © 2006 Royal Society of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene.
Oral miltefosine treatment in children with mild to moderate Indian visceral leishmaniasis
(Lippincott Williams and Wilkins, 2003) Shyam Sundar; T.K. Jha; Herbert Sindermann; Klaus Junge; Peter Bachmann; Jonathan Berman
Background. Miltefosine is the first oral drug with demonstrable success in treating visceral leishmaniasis in adults. Because approximately one-half of the visceral leishmaniasis patients worldwide are children, we performed a Phase I/II dose ranging study in the pediatric population in India. Methods. Thirty-nine (39) children (defined as <12 years of age) with visceral leishmaniasis demonstrated by parasites in splenic aspirates, were treated with oral miltefosine daily for 28 days: 21 patients received 1.5 mg/kg/day (Group A); and 18 patients received 2.5 mg/kg/day (Group B). About one-half of these children had failed prior antileishmanial treatment. Results. All patients were parasitologically negative and symptomatically improved by the end of therapy on Day 28 of therapy; the initial parasitologic cure rate was 100%. Two patients in each treatment group relapsed with fever, splenomegaly and parasite-positive splenic aspirates by the end of the 6-month follow-up. The per protocol final clinical cure rate was 19 of 21 = 90% in Group A and 15 of 17 = 88% in Group B. Miltefosine was well-tolerated. As per the adult experience, gastrointestinal adverse events were seen: 33 and 39% of children experienced vomiting and 5 and 17% experienced diarrhea in Groups A and B, respectively, but all episodes were mild to moderate in severity and commonly lasted <1 day without symptomatic treatment. Conclusion. Oral miltefosine was safe and ∼90% effective in this initial clinical trial of childhood visceral leishmaniasis.
Phase 4 pharmacovigilance trial of paromomycin injection for the treatment of visceral leishmaniasis in India
(2011) Prabhat K. Sinha; T.K. Jha; Chandreshwar P. Thakur; Devendra Nath; Supriyo Mukherjee; Amrendra Kumar Aditya; Shyam Sundar
Background. A phase 3 study demonstrated the safety and efficacy of paromomycin (paromomycin IM injection) for treatment of VL in an inpatient setting. Methods. This phase 4 study was conducted to assess the safety and efficacy of paromomycin in children and adults in an outpatient setting in Bihar, India. Results. This study enrolled 506 adult and pediatric patients. Of the 494 patients in the intent-to-treat (ITT) population, 98 received a full course of treatment. The overall study completion rate was 94 (462/494) for the ITT population and 96 (461/479) for the efficacy-evaluable (EE) population. Initial clinical cure was 99.6, and final clinical cure 6 months after treatment was 94.2. Grade 3 or 4 adverse events occurred in 5 of patients; events with a frequency of ≥1 were increases in alanine aminotransferase and aspartate aminotransferase. Conclusions. This study confirms the safety and efficacy of paromomycin to treat VL in an outpatient setting. © 2011 Prabhat K. Sinha et al.
Single-dose liposomal amphotericin B in the treatment of visceral leishmaniasis in India: A multicenter study
(2003) Shyam Sundar; T.K. Jha; C.P. Thakur; M. Mishra; V.P. Singh; R. Buffels
Widespread antimony resistance renders conventional amphotericin B the only option for the treatment of visceral leishmaniasis (VL) in North Bihar, India. Because of its excellent safety profile, a large dose (7.5 mg/ kg) of liposomal amphotericin B (L-AmB) was given to each of 203 patients with VL at 4 treatment centers, and the patients were discharged the next day. At initial clinical and parasitological follow-up, performed on day 30 after treatment, evidence of a cure was seen in 195 (96%) of 203 patients (95% CI, 92-98); 4 patients experienced treatment failure. Two patients were lost to follow-up, 2 died (one due to progressive disease and another, 5 months after treatment, due to an unrelated illness), and 12 experienced relapses during follow-up. Thus, 183 patients (90%; 95% CI, 85-94) had obtained final cure 6 months after treatment. Very few adverse events (fever with rigor, in 9.8% of patients) were seen. Single-dose L-AmB (7.5 mg/kg) treatment is safe and effective, and it may be used for the mass treatment of VL in India.