Title:
Bacteriological profile and antimicrobial resistance of blood culture isolates from a university hospital

Loading...
Thumbnail Image

Date

Journal Title

Journal ISSN

Volume Title

Publisher

Abstract

Context: Blood stream infections are an important cause of mortality and morbidity and are among the most common health-care associated infections. Illness associated with blood stream infection ranges from self-limiting infections to life-threatening sepsis that require rapid and aggressive antimicrobial treatment. Aims: The objective of the study was to describe the pattern of bacterial isolates from the blood cultures in a university hospital and determine their antibiotic resistance, so that the study can provide guidelines for choosing an effective antibiotic therapy in cases of septicaemia. Settings and design: This is a retrospective study of 2,400 blood samples collected from clinically suspected cases of bacteraemia reviewed over a period of 2 years. Methods and material: The isolates were identified by standard biochemical tests and antimicrobial susceptibility testing determined by National Committee for Clinical Laboratory Standards (NCCLS) guidelines. Results: Positive cultures were obtained in 493 (20.5%) cases. Among culture positive isolates, Gram-negative bacteria accounted for 67.5% cases; most common being Pseudomonas spp. (16%) followed by Salmonella typhi and S. paratyphi A (14.2%). Of the pathogenic Gram-positive isolates, Staphylococcus aureus (8.3%) was the predominant isolate followed by Enterococcus faecalis (3.7%). Maximum Gram-negative isolates were sensitive to cefoperazone-sulbactam combination (81%). Vancomycin sensitivity was reported in 100% Staph. aureus and 83.3% Enterococcus faecalis. Conclusions: This study provides information on antibiotic resistance of blood isolates. It may be a useful guide for physicians initiating empiric therapy and will help in formulation of antibiotic therapy strategy in this part of the country.

Description

Citation

Collections

Endorsement

Review

Supplemented By

Referenced By