Title:
Herbicide and irrigation management options in conventionally-tilled wheat: deciphering water and energy budgeting, and grain and monetary output in north-Indian plains

dc.contributor.authorSunil Kumar Verma
dc.contributor.authorChandra Bhushan
dc.contributor.authorSudhir Kumar S. Rajpoot
dc.contributor.authorRicha Chaudhary
dc.contributor.authorRamawatar Narayan Meena
dc.contributor.authorSanjeev K. Kashyap
dc.contributor.authorVijay Sai Pratap
dc.contributor.authorPeeyush Kumar Jaysawal
dc.contributor.authorSukhchain B. Singh
dc.contributor.authorRam Kumar Singh
dc.contributor.authorDeepak Kumar Yadav
dc.date.accessioned2026-02-19T04:57:13Z
dc.date.issued2025
dc.description.abstractIn South Asia, declining water tables due to increased irrigation and labor shortages for manual weeding pose significant challenges for wheat production. Additionally, herbicide resistance, often resulting from poor management practices, further complicates weed problems. The objective of this study was to assess the impacts of traditional irrigation regimens (IRs) and herbicide application on wheat crops. The findings showed that when irrigation was applied at 100 mm CPE (IR<inf>4</inf>), and at 40 mm CPE (IR<inf>1</inf>), different combinations of herbicide to weed managment were tested. In comparison to the other treatments, application of irrigation at 40 mm cumulative pan evaporation (IR<inf>1</inf>) along with the Pendimethalin<inf>1000</inf> g ha−1 (pre-em) in combination with clodinafop-propargyl 10% + metribuzin 22% + sulfosulfuron 4.2% at a rate of 1125 g ha−1 at 30 DAS (WM<inf>1</inf>) produced the best results in terms of crop yields, economic returns, relative water content, consumptive use, rate of water use, water use efficiency, water productivity, energy input–output, energy returns, energy productivity, energy intensity, specific energy, energy efficiency, maximum field capacity, available soil water, and soil profile moisture extraction pattern. The only exceptions were Pendimethalin<inf>1000</inf>g ha−1 (pre-em) combined with carfentrazone ethyl 20% + sulfosulfuron 25%WG), at the rate of 100 g ha−1 at 30 DAS (WM<inf>2</inf>) and the weed-free treatment (WM<inf>5</inf>), where the differences were not statistically significant. The yield of wheat grain (14.26 kg ha−1) and straw (14.41 kg ha−1) decreased as the unit dry matter production of weeds increased. The study recommends exploring additional weed control strategies and irrigation management options in future improve wheat yields in conventionally-tilled systems. © The Author(s) 2024.
dc.identifier.doi10.1038/s41598-024-81578-6
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-024-81578-6
dc.identifier.urihttps://dl.bhu.ac.in/bhuir/handle/123456789/62905
dc.publisherNature Research
dc.subjectEnergy budgeting
dc.subjectHerbicides
dc.subjectIrrigation
dc.subjectNet returns
dc.subjectWater productivity
dc.subjectWeed
dc.subjectWheat yield
dc.titleHerbicide and irrigation management options in conventionally-tilled wheat: deciphering water and energy budgeting, and grain and monetary output in north-Indian plains
dc.typePublication
dspace.entity.typeArticle

Files

Collections