Title:
Impact of the indigenous rotavirus vaccine Rotavac in the Universal Immunization Program in India during 2016–2020

dc.contributor.authorNayana P. Nair
dc.contributor.authorSamarasimha Nusi Reddy
dc.contributor.authorSidhartha Giri
dc.contributor.authorTintu Varghese
dc.contributor.authorVarunkumar Thiyagarajan
dc.contributor.authorJayaprakash Muliyil
dc.contributor.authorPriya Hemavathy
dc.contributor.authorShainey Alokit Khakha
dc.contributor.authorRashmi Arora
dc.contributor.authorMohan Digambar Gupte
dc.contributor.authorJacqueline Elizabeth Tate
dc.contributor.authorUmesh D. Parashar
dc.contributor.authorVenkata Raghava Mohan
dc.contributor.authorGagandeep Kang
dc.contributor.authorMahima Mittal
dc.contributor.authorSunil Kumar Rao
dc.contributor.authorVineeta Gupta
dc.contributor.authorVipin M. Vashishtha
dc.contributor.authorSanjeev Kumar Verma
dc.contributor.authorKulandaivel Murugiah
dc.contributor.authorRamasubramaniam Pitchumani
dc.contributor.authorSridevi A. Naaraayan
dc.contributor.authorPriyadarishini Dorairaj
dc.contributor.authorGirish Kumar Chethrapilly Purusothaman
dc.contributor.authorSenthilnathan Subramanian
dc.contributor.authorSumanth Amperayani
dc.contributor.authorSundaram Balasubramanian
dc.contributor.authorJayanta Kumar Goswami
dc.contributor.authorAmrit Koirala
dc.contributor.authorShakti Lamichhane
dc.contributor.authorKoshy C. George
dc.contributor.authorAsolie Chase
dc.contributor.authorBhupesh Jain
dc.contributor.authorSuresh C. Goyal
dc.contributor.authorDalpat Rajpurohit
dc.contributor.authorPrabhu Prakash
dc.contributor.authorSunil Kothari
dc.contributor.authorVikash Katewa
dc.contributor.authorPramod Sharma
dc.contributor.authorShailja Vajpayee
dc.contributor.authorAlok Kumar Goyal
dc.contributor.authorBharti Malhotra
dc.contributor.authorR. K. Gupta
dc.contributor.authorPrachi Chaudhary
dc.contributor.authorHemant Jain
dc.contributor.authorMannancheril Abraham Mathew
dc.contributor.authorAsit Mansingh
dc.contributor.authorRashmi Patnaik
dc.contributor.authorSamarendra Mahapatro
dc.contributor.authorSubrat Kumar Majhi
dc.contributor.authorPrasantajyoti Mohanty
dc.contributor.authorRajib Kumar Ray
dc.contributor.authorSubrant Kumar Mohanty
dc.contributor.authorManas Kumar Nayak
dc.contributor.authorNirmal Kumar Mohakud
dc.contributor.authorMamata Devi Mohanty
dc.contributor.authorJ. Bikrant Kumar Prusty
dc.contributor.authorJasashree Choudhury
dc.contributor.authorMrutunjay Dash
dc.contributor.authorSaroj Kumar Satpathy
dc.contributor.authorSubal Kumar Pradhan
dc.contributor.authorJyoti Sharma
dc.contributor.authorSanjeev Chaudhary
dc.contributor.authorPancham Kumar
dc.contributor.authorShayam L. Kaushik
dc.contributor.authorRajesh Kumar
dc.contributor.authorBhavneet Bharti
dc.contributor.authorMini Pritam Singh
dc.contributor.authorMuralidharan P. Jayashree
dc.contributor.authorAkshay Kumar Saxena
dc.contributor.authorKushaljit Singh Sodhi
dc.contributor.authorArun Bansal
dc.contributor.authorRavi Prakash Kanojia
dc.contributor.authorAdarsh Bansal
dc.contributor.authorMadhu Gupta
dc.contributor.authorPreeti Raikwar
dc.contributor.authorManoj Rawal
dc.contributor.authorAnil Kumar Goel
dc.contributor.authorSuraj Chawla
dc.contributor.authorPoonam Dalal
dc.contributor.authorGeeta Gathwala
dc.contributor.authorManohar Badur
dc.contributor.authorGorthi Rajendra Prasad
dc.contributor.authorK. Kameswari
dc.contributor.authorPadmalatha Pamu
dc.contributor.authorJeeru Bhaskara Reddy
dc.contributor.authorJ. Manikyamba
dc.contributor.authorKrishna Babu Goru
dc.contributor.authorG. S. Rama Prasad
dc.contributor.authorG. V. Rama Devi
dc.contributor.authorSuhasini Mekala
dc.contributor.authorSowmiya V. Senthamizh
dc.contributor.authorSunita Bidari
dc.date.accessioned2026-02-19T06:38:24Z
dc.date.issued2025
dc.description.abstractIn 2016, India introduced Rotavac (G9P[11]), an indigenous oral rotavirus vaccine administered at 6, 10 and 14 weeks of age through the Universal Immunization Program. Evaluating its effectiveness under routine programmatic conditions is critical, given the variable performance of rotavirus vaccines in low- and middle-income countries. Here we assessed Rotavac’s real-world effectiveness and impact across 31 hospitals in 9 states between 2016 and 2020 using a test-negative case–control design. Overall, 24,624 children were enrolled in surveillance (62% male and 38% female). Of 8,372 children aged 6–59 months eligible for effectiveness analysis (1,790 rotavirus-positive cases and 5,437 rotavirus-negative controls), 6,646 received 3 doses and 581 were unvaccinated. The adjusted vaccine effectiveness of 3 doses against severe rotavirus gastroenteritis was 54% (95% confidence interval (CI) 45% to 62%), with 1,574 vaccinated cases versus 5,072 vaccinated controls. Among children aged 6–23 months (1,486 vaccinated cases and 4,595 vaccinated controls), genotype-specific adjusted vaccine effectiveness was 51% (95% CI 36% to 62%) for G3P[8], 81% (95% CI 73% to 87%) for G1P[8] and 64% (95% CI 21% to 83%) for G1P[6]. Following vaccine introduction, rotavirus positivity among hospitalized children declined from 40% to 20%. These findings confirm that Rotavac provides substantial protection against severe rotavirus disease, including nonvaccine strains, and performs comparably to internationally licensed vaccines in similar settings. © The Author(s) 2025.
dc.identifier.doi10.1038/s41591-025-03998-9
dc.identifier.issn10788956; 1546170X
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.1038/s41591-025-03998-9
dc.identifier.urihttps://dl.bhu.ac.in/bhuir/handle/123456789/63249
dc.publisherNature Research
dc.titleImpact of the indigenous rotavirus vaccine Rotavac in the Universal Immunization Program in India during 2016–2020
dc.typePublication
dspace.entity.typeArticle

Files

Collections