Title:
“What do Ayurveda Postgraduate Entrance Examinations actually assess?” – Results of a five-year period question-paper analysis based on Bloom's taxonomy

dc.contributor.authorDeepti Singh
dc.contributor.authorPiyush Kumar Tripathi
dc.contributor.authorKishor Patwardhan
dc.date.accessioned2026-02-07T08:16:24Z
dc.date.issued2016
dc.description.abstractBackground The standards of Ayurveda education in India are being questioned in the recent years and many suggestions related to educational reforms are being put forth by educators and health policy experts. However, the Post Graduate Entrance Examinations (PGEEs) that are carried out to select the candidates to pursue postgraduate programs have received little attention in this context. Objectives The objective of this study was to classify the Multiple Choice Questions (MCQs) from Ayurveda PGEEs conducted in different universities of India during the five year period (ranging from 2010 to 2014) into six levels of Bloom's Taxonomy in cognitive domain. Methods This is a retrospective observational study. The sampling method followed was purposive sampling. Totally, 3299 MCQs obtained out of 25 question papers from seven universities spread across four zones of India (North, South, West and East) were included in the study and were classified based on the Bloom's taxonomy. Results About 93.3% of MCQs assessed only the ‘recall’ component whereas 6.2% of the MCQs assessed ‘comprehension’. Percentage of MCQs that assessed ‘application’ level was a mere 0.3% whereas the percentage of MCQs that assessed the ‘analysis’ component was found to be only 0.2%. There was not even a single question to assess the ‘synthesis’ and ‘evaluation’ components. Conclusions We conclude that an appropriate proportion of MCQs assessing ‘higher order thinking’ are required to be included in Ayurveda PGEEs. While it is possible to frame MCQs to assess all six levels of Bloom's taxonomy in cognitive domain, the teachers are required to be trained well in the skills of MCQ writing. We propose that our study may be taken as a lead to introduce the required reforms in PGEEs. Clinical Trial Registration No.: Not applicable. © 2016 Transdisciplinary University, Bangalore and World Ayurveda Foundation
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.jaim.2016.06.005
dc.identifier.issn9759476
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaim.2016.06.005
dc.identifier.urihttps://dl.bhu.ac.in/bhuir/handle/123456789/29009
dc.publisherElsevier B.V.
dc.subjectAssessment in education
dc.subjectAyurveda
dc.subjectEducation
dc.subjectExamination
dc.subjectHigher order thinking Bloom's taxonomy
dc.subjectMultiple choice questions
dc.subjectQualifying test
dc.subjectTraditional Indian medicine
dc.title“What do Ayurveda Postgraduate Entrance Examinations actually assess?” – Results of a five-year period question-paper analysis based on Bloom's taxonomy
dc.typePublication
dspace.entity.typeArticle

Files

Collections