Title: A comparative study on the electrocatalytic efficiency of coupled (CuO-Co3O4) vs. mixed (CuCo2O4) metal oxides: Probed by hydrazine oxidation and sensitive determination
| dc.contributor.author | Smita Singh | |
| dc.contributor.author | Varsha K. Singh | |
| dc.contributor.author | Vikram Singh Rathour | |
| dc.contributor.author | Vellaichamy Ganesan | |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2026-02-19T13:37:17Z | |
| dc.date.issued | 2025 | |
| dc.description.abstract | This work reports the synthesis of copper- and cobalt-based coupled and mixed metal oxides (CuO-Co<inf>3</inf>O<inf>4</inf> and CuCo<inf>2</inf>O<inf>4</inf>, respectively) utilizing a simple hydrothermal and calcination approach. CuO-Co<inf>3</inf>O<inf>4</inf>, CuCo<inf>2</inf>O<inf>4</inf>, and the control samples were characterized by powder X-ray diffraction (XRD), high-resolution transmission electron microscopy (HR-TEM), field emission scanning electron microscopy (FE-SEM), energy dispersive X-ray, and X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy. TEM and FE-SEM analyses of CuO-Co<inf>3</inf>O<inf>4</inf> reveal the presence of two distinct morphologies: rod- and sphere-shaped particles (CuO and Co<inf>3</inf>O<inf>4</inf>, respectively). Further, CuO-Co<inf>3</inf>O<inf>4</inf> was efficiently utilized as an electrocatalyst for the selective oxidation of hydrazine (Hyz). CuO-Co<inf>3</inf>O<inf>4</inf> shows a high redox response compared to CuO, Co<inf>3</inf>O<inf>4</inf>, CuCo<inf>2</inf>O<inf>4</inf>, and the physical mixture of CuO and Co<inf>3</inf>O<inf>4</inf> (CuO/Co<inf>3</inf>O<inf>4</inf>). This enhanced performance is attributed to the synergistic interaction between the metal ions caused by their close proximity and the increased exposure of surface active sites. CuO-Co<inf>3</inf>O<inf>4</inf> shows a broad linear range (1–3500 µM), a low detection limit (0.29 µM), and high sensitivity (0.5756 µA µM-1 cm-2) for the Hyz determination. Kinetic parameters, for instance the diffusion coefficient and catalytic rate constant for Hyz oxidation were obtained using chronoamperometry. Additionally, CuO-Co<inf>3</inf>O<inf>4</inf> was effectively utilized to analyze Hyz in real samples with acceptable recovery rates. © 2024 Elsevier Ltd | |
| dc.identifier.doi | 10.1016/j.electacta.2024.145337 | |
| dc.identifier.issn | 134686 | |
| dc.identifier.uri | https://doi.org/10.1016/j.electacta.2024.145337 | |
| dc.identifier.uri | https://dl.bhu.ac.in/bhuir/handle/123456789/64863 | |
| dc.publisher | Elsevier Ltd | |
| dc.subject | Amperometry | |
| dc.subject | Coupled metal oxides | |
| dc.subject | Electrocatalysis | |
| dc.subject | Electrochemical sensing | |
| dc.subject | Hydrazine oxidation | |
| dc.subject | Mixed metal oxides | |
| dc.title | A comparative study on the electrocatalytic efficiency of coupled (CuO-Co3O4) vs. mixed (CuCo2O4) metal oxides: Probed by hydrazine oxidation and sensitive determination | |
| dc.type | Publication | |
| dspace.entity.type | Article |
