Title:
Characterisation of islet antibody-negative type 1 diabetes mellitus in Indian children

dc.contributor.authorJayakrishnan C. Menon
dc.contributor.authorPratibha Singh
dc.contributor.authorArchana Archana
dc.contributor.authorUma Kanga
dc.contributor.authorPreeti Lata Singh
dc.contributor.authorMedha Mittal
dc.contributor.authorAtul Garg
dc.contributor.authorAnju Seth
dc.contributor.authorVijayalakshmi Bhatia
dc.contributor.authorPreeti Dabadghao
dc.contributor.authorSiddhnath Sudhanshu
dc.contributor.authorRuchira Vishwakarma
dc.contributor.authorShivendra Verma
dc.contributor.authorShipra Kumar Singh
dc.contributor.authorEesh Bhatia
dc.date.accessioned2026-02-19T11:37:22Z
dc.date.issued2025
dc.description.abstractAims: Islet antibody-negative type 1 diabetes mellitus (T1DM) has not been well characterised. We determined the frequency of antibody-negative T1DM and compared it with antibody-positive T1DM in a cohort of north Indian children. Methods: In a multi-centre, prospective, observational study, 176 Indian children (age 1–18 years) were assessed within 2 weeks of diagnosis of T1DM. Antibodies against GAD65 (GADA), islet antigen-2 (IA-2A) and zinc transporter 8 (ZnT8A), were estimated using validated ELISA. HLA-DRB1, DQA1 and DQB1 alleles were studied by Luminex-based typing. Monogenic diabetes was determined by targeted next-generation sequencing using the Illumina platform. Results: After excluding 12 children with monogenic diabetes, GADA, IA-2A and ZnT8A were present in 124 (76%), 60 (37%) and 62 (38%) children, respectively, while 24 (15%) were negative for all antibodies. A single antibody (most frequently GADA) was present in 68 (41%) of children, while all three antibodies were found in 34 (21%). Islet antibody-negative T1DM (n = 24, 15%) did not differ from antibody-positive children in their clinical features, HbA1c or plasma C-peptide, both at onset or after 1 year follow-up (available in 62 children). The frequency of other organ-specific antibodies or high-risk HLA-DR and DQ alleles were also similar. Children with a single islet antibody did not differ from those with multiple antibodies. Conclusions: The frequency of various islet-antibodies, in isolation and combination, differed considerably from studies among children of European descent with T1DM. Children with T1DM who were islet antibody-negative were indistinguishable from those who were antibody-positive. © 2024 Diabetes UK.
dc.identifier.doi10.1111/dme.15477
dc.identifier.issn7423071
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.1111/dme.15477
dc.identifier.urihttps://dl.bhu.ac.in/bhuir/handle/123456789/64399
dc.publisherJohn Wiley and Sons Inc
dc.subjecthuman leucocyte antigen
dc.subjectidiopathic type 1 diabetes
dc.subjectislet-antibody
dc.subjecttype 1 diabetes mellitus
dc.subjecttype 1B diabetes
dc.titleCharacterisation of islet antibody-negative type 1 diabetes mellitus in Indian children
dc.typePublication
dspace.entity.typeArticle

Files

Collections