Title: Efficacy and safety of cetuximab-based versus platinum-based chemoradiation in HNSCC: evidence from a meta-analysis of 10 randomized controlled trials
| dc.contributor.author | Tarun Kumar | |
| dc.contributor.author | Nishu Kesh | |
| dc.contributor.author | Atindra Kumar Pandey | |
| dc.contributor.author | Ankita Chakrawal | |
| dc.contributor.author | Bhavana Singh | |
| dc.contributor.author | Manjusha Pal | |
| dc.contributor.author | Monika Rajput | |
| dc.contributor.author | Ruhi Dixit | |
| dc.contributor.author | Esha Pai | |
| dc.contributor.author | Manoj Pandey | |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2026-02-19T17:07:04Z | |
| dc.date.issued | 2025 | |
| dc.description.abstract | Background: Platinum-based chemoradiotherapy (CTRT) is the standard treatment for head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC). While cetuximab-based radiotherapy (CxRT) has been proposed as an alternative, its efficacy remains controversial. Multiple meta-analyses have compared CxRT with CTRT for HNSCC though they combined randomized controlled trials (RCTs) with lower-evidence studies, compromising result validity. This study presents the first meta-analysis using exclusively RCT data, providing the highest level of evidence for clinical decision-making. Methods: We systematically searched MEDLINE, Embase, Cochrane, and SCOPUS, identifying 10 RCTs (n = 2,557 patients). Primary outcomes included overall survival (OS), disease-free survival (DFS), and all-cause mortality; secondary outcomes were Grade ≥ 3 toxicities. Hazard ratios (HRs) and odds ratios (ORs) were pooled using random effect models. Results: CxRT was associated with a 50% higher recurrence risk (HR 1.50, 95% CI 1.07–2.10) and 27% increased all-cause mortality (OR 1.27, 95% CI 1.05–1.55) compared to CTRT. OS did not differ significantly (HR 1.33, 95% CI 0.79–2.22). Toxicity profiles varied: CxRT had higher mucositis (OR 1.17, 95% CI 1.04–1.32) and skin rash (OR 3.46, 95% CI 1.28–9.36), while CTRT showed more anemia (OR 0.15, 95% CI 0.05–0.52) and nausea/vomiting (OR 0.31, 95% CI 0.19–0.53). Conclusion: CxRT is inferior to CTRT in HNSCC, with poorer disease control and survival outcomes. The lack of biomarker (EGFR/RAS) stratification in trials may have contributed to suboptimal patient selection. While CxRT may be an option for cisplatin-ineligible patients, platinum-based therapy appears to be the standard. Future research should optimize cetuximab’s role through biomarker-driven selection. © The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Federación de Sociedades Españolas de Oncología (FESEO) 2025. | |
| dc.identifier.doi | 10.1007/s12094-025-04044-3 | |
| dc.identifier.issn | 1699048X | |
| dc.identifier.uri | https://doi.org/10.1007/s12094-025-04044-3 | |
| dc.identifier.uri | https://dl.bhu.ac.in/bhuir/handle/123456789/65669 | |
| dc.publisher | Springer Science and Business Media Deutschland GmbH | |
| dc.subject | Cetuximab | |
| dc.subject | Chemoradiotherapy | |
| dc.subject | Meta-analysis | |
| dc.subject | Radiosensitizing agents | |
| dc.subject | Squamous cell carcinoma of head and neck | |
| dc.title | Efficacy and safety of cetuximab-based versus platinum-based chemoradiation in HNSCC: evidence from a meta-analysis of 10 randomized controlled trials | |
| dc.type | Publication | |
| dspace.entity.type | Article |
