Title: Comparative study of the deformation modulus of rock masses—a reply to the comments received from Gokceoglu (2018)
| dc.contributor.author | Suman Panthee | |
| dc.contributor.author | P.K. Singh | |
| dc.contributor.author | Ashutosh Kainthola | |
| dc.contributor.author | Ratan Das | |
| dc.contributor.author | T.N. Singh | |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2026-02-07T08:46:50Z | |
| dc.date.issued | 2018 | |
| dc.description.abstract | Availability of information on the deformation modulus in the initial stages of civil engineering projects related to near-surface or underground excavation is very important for design purposes. However, direct determination of the deformation modulus is a challenging task and a potentially costly one; therefore, several researchers have frequently used indirect methods to assess the deformation modulus. Of the significant number of empirical equations that can be found in literature, most are non-linear, which makes the deformation modulus a parameter that is very sensitive to the quality and types of data used. © 2018, Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature. | |
| dc.identifier.doi | 10.1007/s10064-018-1272-z | |
| dc.identifier.issn | 14359529 | |
| dc.identifier.uri | https://doi.org/10.1007/s10064-018-1272-z | |
| dc.identifier.uri | https://dl.bhu.ac.in/bhuir/handle/123456789/32354 | |
| dc.publisher | Springer Verlag | |
| dc.subject | Data sensitivity | |
| dc.subject | Deformation modulus | |
| dc.subject | Empirical equations | |
| dc.subject | Indirect determination | |
| dc.subject | Rock mass classification | |
| dc.title | Comparative study of the deformation modulus of rock masses—a reply to the comments received from Gokceoglu (2018) | |
| dc.type | Publication | |
| dspace.entity.type | Note |
