Title:
Comparative study of the deformation modulus of rock masses—a reply to the comments received from Gokceoglu (2018)

dc.contributor.authorSuman Panthee
dc.contributor.authorP.K. Singh
dc.contributor.authorAshutosh Kainthola
dc.contributor.authorRatan Das
dc.contributor.authorT.N. Singh
dc.date.accessioned2026-02-07T08:46:50Z
dc.date.issued2018
dc.description.abstractAvailability of information on the deformation modulus in the initial stages of civil engineering projects related to near-surface or underground excavation is very important for design purposes. However, direct determination of the deformation modulus is a challenging task and a potentially costly one; therefore, several researchers have frequently used indirect methods to assess the deformation modulus. Of the significant number of empirical equations that can be found in literature, most are non-linear, which makes the deformation modulus a parameter that is very sensitive to the quality and types of data used. © 2018, Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature.
dc.identifier.doi10.1007/s10064-018-1272-z
dc.identifier.issn14359529
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.1007/s10064-018-1272-z
dc.identifier.urihttps://dl.bhu.ac.in/bhuir/handle/123456789/32354
dc.publisherSpringer Verlag
dc.subjectData sensitivity
dc.subjectDeformation modulus
dc.subjectEmpirical equations
dc.subjectIndirect determination
dc.subjectRock mass classification
dc.titleComparative study of the deformation modulus of rock masses—a reply to the comments received from Gokceoglu (2018)
dc.typePublication
dspace.entity.typeNote

Files

Collections