Title: Peri-implant stress distribution assessment of various attachment systems for implant supported overdenture prosthesis by finite element analysis – A systematic review
| dc.contributor.author | Bappaditya Bhattacharjee | |
| dc.contributor.author | Ritu Saneja | |
| dc.contributor.author | Ankita Singh | |
| dc.contributor.author | Pavan Kumar Dubey | |
| dc.contributor.author | Atul Bhatnagar | |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2026-02-07T10:57:46Z | |
| dc.date.issued | 2022 | |
| dc.description.abstract | Background: Various attachments like ball, bar-clip, magnetic attachments are used in implant supported overdentures. Finite Element Analysis (FEA) a newly innovated technology has been used in dental implantology to evaluate stress distribution patterns. There is little evidence available regarding the stress distribution in peri-implant region for implant supported overdentures. The purpose of the review was to generate scientific evidence on peri-implant stress distribution in FEA model with different types of attachments employed in implant supported overdentures. Materials and methods: Systematic review was conducted as per the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews Guidelines and Meta-Analyses statement (PRISMA). A comprehensive search was undertaken by two reviewers from January 2020 to June 2020 with no year limits to published articles. Only in-vitro FEA studies were included. Following electronic databases were searched for published studies- PubMed, Web of Science. Characteristics of the studies tabulated and analysis of articles was done to compare different attachment systems. Results: Locator attachments showed better stress distribution than ball attachment system in all the studies but one. Two studies showed results in favour of ball attachment compared to bar-clip attachment system when stress was evaluated distal to the implants. No significant difference in terms of stress concentration could be generated between ball versus magnetic/equator versus locator attachment system due to less number of studies and conflicting results. Conclusion: Various studies showed different results due to heterogenicity in selected attachment systems and study designs. Locator attachments showed favourable stress distribution around peri-implant bone than other attachments. © 2022 Craniofacial Research Foundation | |
| dc.identifier.doi | 10.1016/j.jobcr.2022.09.002 | |
| dc.identifier.issn | 22124268 | |
| dc.identifier.uri | https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jobcr.2022.09.002 | |
| dc.identifier.uri | https://dl.bhu.ac.in/bhuir/handle/123456789/40424 | |
| dc.publisher | Elsevier B.V. | |
| dc.title | Peri-implant stress distribution assessment of various attachment systems for implant supported overdenture prosthesis by finite element analysis – A systematic review | |
| dc.type | Publication | |
| dspace.entity.type | Review |
