Jha P.Christiansen C.O.2025-01-132025-01-13202417496977https://dl.bhu.ac.in/ir/handle/123456789/3196This article revisits the intellectual history of inequality in the thinking of Dr Bhimrao Ramji Ambedkar (1891�1956) and Dr Ram Manohar Lohia (1910�1967). Both were pivotal figures in the intellectual history of inequality in colonial and postcolonial India. Yet little work has been done to systematically juxtapose the two and their thinking on inequality. This article offers a first comparison, arguing that their ideas on inequality can be seen as the emergence of a unique, Indian version of what, in this article, we term �organic intersectionality.� We build this argument on four claims. First, both were organic intellectuals whose thinking was molded in the marginalized groups from which they arose, but whose ideas developed in unique and organic ways. Second, both had a unique eye to the intersectional and holistic character of Indian inequality, cutting across caste, class, race, and gender. Third, their thinking grew from a deep engagement with religion, which they saw as both legitimizing and delegitimizing inequality. Fourth, both these figures exemplify postcolonial hybridity and thus stand in contrast both to a diffusionist approach whereby ideas are simply diffused from the West to the East, and to a nationalized, self-contained, or decolonial history of ideas. � 2024 The Author(s). Published by Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group.enCasteglobal intellectual historyIndiaintersectionalityorganic intellectualsreligionArticle10.1080/17496977.2024.2365023