Title:
In vitro susceptibility of dermatophytes to oral antifungal drugs and amphotericin B in Uttar Pradesh, India

dc.contributor.authorSatyendra Kumar Singh
dc.contributor.authorDheeraj Kumar Patwa
dc.contributor.authorRagini Tilak
dc.contributor.authorArghya Das
dc.contributor.authorTej Bali Singh
dc.date.accessioned2026-02-07T09:05:26Z
dc.date.issued2019
dc.description.abstractBackground: Dermatophytosis is a major public health problem in our country. Although resistance to conventional oral and topical antifungal agents is being increasingly encountered, the sensitivity pattern of dermatophytes has not been systematically analysed. Aims: We aimed to determine the sensitivity pattern of dermatophyte isolates to amphotericin B and six oral antifungal drugs. Materials and Methods: Patients with dermatophytosis attending the outpatient department of dermatology were enrolled in the study. Samples were collected for mycological examination and in vitro antifungal sensitivity testing was done by broth microdilution as per the Clinical and Laboratory Standard Institute M38-A standards. Results: A total of 804 patients were enrolled. Specimens from 185 patients (23%) were both KOH and culture positive, and 44 of these isolates (41 Trichophyton mentagrophytes and 3 Trichophyton rubrum) were subjected to sensitivity testing. Minimum inhibitory concentrations (MIC) of itraconazole, ketoconazole, voriconazole and amphotericin B were comparable. The median MIC to fluconazole was higher than the other tested drugs. Dermatophytes were most susceptible to ketoconazole and voriconazole, followed by itraconazole, amphotericin B, fluconazole and griseofulvin. A high incidence of resistance was found to terbinafine and the difference was statistically significant in comparison to fluconazole, itraconazole, voriconazole, ketoconazole (P = 0.001) and griseofulvin (P = 0.003). The strains were more sensitive to amphotericin B as compared to griseofulvin (P = 0.02) and terbinafine (P < 0.001). Limitations: This was a hospital-based study and may not reflect the true pattern in the community. Only a few of the isolates were selected for study. The clinical response of patients, whose isolates were studied for in vitro sensitivity of the antifungals, was not studied. Conclusions: The sensitivity pattern of dermatophytes to various antifungals including amphotericin B, ketoconazole, voriconazole and itraconazole were determined. The studied isolates were least susceptible to terbinafine. © 2019 Indian Journal of Dermatology, Venereology and Leprology.
dc.identifier.doi10.4103/ijdvl.IJDVL_319_18
dc.identifier.issn3786323
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.4103/ijdvl.IJDVL_319_18
dc.identifier.urihttps://dl.bhu.ac.in/bhuir/handle/123456789/33717
dc.publisherWolters Kluwer Medknow Publications
dc.subjectAmphotericin-B
dc.subjectantifungal
dc.subjectdermatophytes
dc.subjectin vitro
dc.subjectresistance
dc.subjectvoriconazole
dc.titleIn vitro susceptibility of dermatophytes to oral antifungal drugs and amphotericin B in Uttar Pradesh, India
dc.typePublication
dspace.entity.typeArticle

Files

Collections